<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Professional Development on Continue</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/professional-development/</link><description>Recent content in Professional Development on Continue</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><copyright>Tim Kong. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/professional-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The future may or may not be Finnish</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/the-future-may-or-may-not-be-finnish/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:30:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/the-future-may-or-may-not-be-finnish/</guid><description>&lt;p>Last Friday the &lt;a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1306/S00317/21st-century-learning-reference-group-announced.htm">21st Century Learning Reference Group&lt;/a> here in NZ released their &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://http://www.minedu.govt.nz/~/media/MinEdu/Files/TheMinistry/EducationInitiatives/FutureFocusedLearning30May2014.doc">&lt;em>Future-focused learning in connected communities&lt;/em>&lt;/a>&amp;rdquo; report. The document is worth a read, but if you&amp;rsquo;re busy, read &lt;a href="http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/EducationInitiatives/UFBInSchools/FutureFocusedLearning.aspx">the summary&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/245990/computer-skills-essential,-says-report">RadioNZ&lt;/a> has already picked up the story, and reported these key points:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>&amp;quot;.. the ministry should recognise digital competencies as essential foundation skills.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Defining and refining what &amp;ldquo;digital competencies&amp;rdquo; actually are, and deciding how to measure them will be problematic. The NZ curriculum, as far as I&amp;rsquo;m aware does not contain any standards or frameworks for what this &amp;lsquo;digital competence&amp;rsquo; may look like.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Make PD work for us. All of us.</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/make-pd-work-for-us-all-of-us/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:17:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/make-pd-work-for-us-all-of-us/</guid><description>&lt;p>This evening I read Derek Wenmoth&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://blog.core-ed.org/derek/2012/02/breaking-the-habit.html">latest blog post&lt;/a>, which highlights the McKinsey report titled:&lt;br>
&lt;a href="http://mckinseyonsociety.com/breaking-the-habit-of-ineffective-professional-development-for-teachers/">Breaking the habit of ineffective professional development for teachers&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve not had the chance to read the report in full, and it&amp;rsquo;s only 12 pages long, so I will get around to reading it. But in summary, the report identifies these promising ideas:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Base the PD program on a vision of effective teaching;&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;ol start="2">
&lt;li>Segment teachers and deliver PD strategically;&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Make coaching the centerpiece of PD;&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Move from “push” to “pull,” so that teachers get what they want, when they want it; and&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Only offer PD with demonstrated impact.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>As said, I&amp;rsquo;ve not read the report in full, but here are my initial reactions/thoughts to this summary. At first glance it seems to see teachers as working in isolation - professionals that can upgraded and who then maintain those skills indefinitely by virtue of having a patch applied. It seems to ignore the collaborative and highly personal nature of the profession.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>