<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Measures on Continue</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/measures/</link><description>Recent content in Measures on Continue</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><copyright>Tim Kong. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/measures/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When measuring matters</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/when-measuring-matters/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:15:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/when-measuring-matters/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;If a measurement matters at all, it is because it must have some conceivable effect on decisions and behaviour. If we can&amp;rsquo;t identify a decision that could be affected by a proposed measurement and how it could change those decisions, then the measurement simply has no value”&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/249999.Douglas_W_Hubbard">Douglas W. Hubbard&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>Do we do this enough in education?  Honestly and rigorously identify the decisions that could be affected by a proposed measurement.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>