<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Foo on Continue</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/foo/</link><description>Recent content in Foo on Continue</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><copyright>Tim Kong. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/foo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Make PD work for us. All of us.</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/make-pd-work-for-us-all-of-us/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:17:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/make-pd-work-for-us-all-of-us/</guid><description>&lt;p>This evening I read Derek Wenmoth&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://blog.core-ed.org/derek/2012/02/breaking-the-habit.html">latest blog post&lt;/a>, which highlights the McKinsey report titled:&lt;br>
&lt;a href="http://mckinseyonsociety.com/breaking-the-habit-of-ineffective-professional-development-for-teachers/">Breaking the habit of ineffective professional development for teachers&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I&amp;rsquo;ve not had the chance to read the report in full, and it&amp;rsquo;s only 12 pages long, so I will get around to reading it. But in summary, the report identifies these promising ideas:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Base the PD program on a vision of effective teaching;&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;ol start="2">
&lt;li>Segment teachers and deliver PD strategically;&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Make coaching the centerpiece of PD;&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Move from “push” to “pull,” so that teachers get what they want, when they want it; and&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Only offer PD with demonstrated impact.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>As said, I&amp;rsquo;ve not read the report in full, but here are my initial reactions/thoughts to this summary. At first glance it seems to see teachers as working in isolation - professionals that can upgraded and who then maintain those skills indefinitely by virtue of having a patch applied. It seems to ignore the collaborative and highly personal nature of the profession.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>