<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>#Edchat on Continue</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/%23edchat/</link><description>Recent content in #Edchat on Continue</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><copyright>Tim Kong. Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/tags/%23edchat/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On discomfort</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/on-discomfort/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/on-discomfort/</guid><description>&lt;p>This article - &lt;a href="http://dirtystylus.com/2015/01/21/dev-discomfort/">Dev Discomfort&lt;/a> - is written to reflect the pressures and stresses on being a developer - but it reflects very well what it means to be a teacher in an education system increasingly being flooded with technology and tools.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;I feel like my relationship with my tools has gotten flipped—instead of them existing to serve my needs, I feel like I have to improve myself to be able to use them. &amp;hellip; The prerequisites have gotten so large that it feels like I can’t even get good at something before the whole rickety system has been replaced by something new. &lt;strong>Not necessarily better in ways that matter to me, mind you. Just new.&lt;/strong>&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Pimpin' ain't easy</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/pimpin-aint-easy/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 02:27:07 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/pimpin-aint-easy/</guid><description>&lt;p>In my role as IT/e-learning lead teacher I get lots of queries and requests for help. But two questions put to me this week got me thinking.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Q1: &amp;ldquo;I am getting a lot of can’t send  undeliverable messages-have been for over a week.  On my class computer under outlook I have a whole lot of unsent because they won’t go. Could you have a look at some stage as my parent emails are not making it at times-even when reply to sender.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>"Technology at the core"</title><link>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/technology-at-the-core/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:23:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://2009f00d.continue-nz.pages.dev/technology-at-the-core/</guid><description>&lt;p>Technology drives South Korean &amp;lsquo;smart&amp;rsquo; schools.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Not much mention of learning in this video. Instead it&amp;rsquo;s all about the technology. Because that&amp;rsquo;s what makes a school &amp;ldquo;smart&amp;rdquo;. Apparently. I know it&amp;rsquo;s the job of the media to focus on the shiny. I&amp;rsquo;m not even that bothered about the hints of &amp;lsquo;Big Brother&amp;quot;, or the counting of calories in school lunches.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But I was a little worried.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Because if you look closely and pay attention to the model of learning, and imagine that the shiny tablets are just a normal tablet made out of paper, and that the large MS Windows powered touchscreen is just a black board, it demonstrates the model of learning that exists in behind all of the hi-tech, &amp;lsquo;smart&amp;rsquo; shiny on display. A model that&amp;rsquo;s largely untouched over the last 100 years. In which a person stands up the front and tells a bunch of other folk what&amp;rsquo;s important.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>